How Long Can My Cat Go Without Eating Or Drinking

Eva, Maria and women priests.

Christian theology, especially Catholic, puts women at a lower level. Considers man and woman spirit matter who plays, who denies his sexuality, emphasizing the condition of subordinating their lives to fulfill their reproductive role sentenced the woman to give birth without limits and without conditions.

The condition of subordination in which women have lived through Christian history, comes as the result of a decision divine punishment from God. The man against the woman for her participation in original sin. In the Old Testament, the woman appears as the negative symbol of the flesh, temptation, with an Eve without its own, the result of man's rib representing sin, evil, who was also responsible for the death and the pain of all humanity.

The Catholic Church covers misogyny, as demonstrated throughout history. Santo Tomas de Aquino, of the Order Dominican writes that in his Summa Theologica " women is one thing and occasional imperfect, is subject to man, in whom there is naturally better discernment of reason"

Tertullian of Carthage, Christian apologist, wrote that " each woman should be walking like Eve, distraught and remorseful, and as punishment must feel the pain of giving birth to children in need of a husband and being dominated by it. "

The Charter of the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Collaboration of Men and Women in the Church yl World, published by the Vatican on July 31, 2004, shows the clear animosity towards women in defense of God as male. Ratzinger said in this speech, that God through the Catholic Church has decided to lift the punishment of women. All she has to do is follow the example of Mary and its "rules of listening, welcoming, humility, faithfulness, praise and waiting" in the New Testament patriarchal interpretations of biblical texts by the Catholic Church emphasize , transforming the figure of a young Maria Clara, in this woman made for pain, resigned acceptance, without initiative and a lifetime devoted to chastity.

This reflection is not against religion, but specifically manifestations of discrimination against overlapping after the religious language and are estimated as products of history. Are men (men and women) who have consolidated inequality as a means of fulfilling specific social functions, eg segregation of the feminine sphere (home and upbringing, with a multiplication of the symbolic values \u200b\u200bof the depths) of of male (bounce to the outside) could be a timely and efficient adaptation. Therefore can redefine the guidelines convivial and ideological mechanisms that warrant.

feminist theology, very active, for example in the heart of Catholicism, does not intend to remove religion but the justifications of discrimination: for example in relation to women priests, and against the argument that only priests charisms given by the Holy Spirit to men, answer is not that the third person of the Trinity is male, but they are the ones that recognize these gifts, they do not look at women.

Advocates, therefore, a need to create a common framework of behavior, should agree on the disappearance of this terrible kind of discriminatory and degrading practices. This is a very complex problem: the need for a common ethic, which has respect for cultural and religious diversity, but on par with all characters religiocéntricos ethnocentric and that weakens serve to end in this case with discrimination.