Today marks the anniversary of the defeat suffered by workers at the hands of a bourgeoisie killer perk and unscrupulous. Corporations who defend the privilege of this kind succeeded to country to impose a perverse logic whose claim was not yet dismantled. The murderers in the pay of the armed forces, police and mafia structures continued to parallel the "epic" that began with the bombing of his own people in 1955. The Catholic church with individual exceptions, but with a clear political line imposed its model-censorship and ignorance getting their share of the state budget become war booty. And the ideologues of "nationalism" fascist (all day waving the flag of "field") provided in the Jockey Club for a homeland that is certainly not that to which Martinez de Hoz flag shot put, while bowed their heads to the ground to the passage of Henry Kissinger.
finish the draft of the Military Party, his minions could not avoid some of the popular anger overtake them. Fags cry today because they have to parade through the courts and are indignant because their owners did not save when yesterday they were given the sum of public power and the decision of life and death over every citizen. They are so stupid they do not realize that their role begins and ends exactly in the best interests of the oppressor class, who are seen as mere employees engaged in work rather dirty and unworthy only for reasons of mere propaganda daubed with the word "homeland."
forget that they do not are far from being part of that class to which they defended like obedient soldiers, most of your last name is of no ancestry and often even of two generations of Argentines defect that senior members of the armed forces attempted to address women marrying of the oligarchy, which in turn made of cement to unite the economic power to the power of fire: why a lady of the aristocracy, she married the son of an organ methane in uniform. The blue blood is blue blood, but tickets are the tickets.
This class is rotten which still rules, even with this government, I maintain, is the best I had in Argentina in 30 years. What happens is that they are 30 years during which we did not know much more than anxiety. It's like Groucho Marx said: "It's
you the most beautiful woman I've known ... which does not say much.
While this class is not stripped of power by workers in Argentina there will be nothing but class struggle disguised in various forms. Struggle in which workers do not take any initiative today, on the contrary: they are the most parasitic and backward representatives of the bourgeoisie, those who simply have taken over part of the country to plunder its natural resources without further horizon than marking the prey, which added fuel to throw cauldron of hatred and stupidity. What they have is not enough and never will be enough, because greed has no bottom.
The so called "middle class", a mixture of petty bourgeois and privileged workers, enjoy a well as decades ago did not know. However, the ideological domination of big capital has made up his mind to a bunch of brainless who vote against their own interests. I guess many people openly antikirchnerista is mulling whether to order carefully and should not vote out the government view of what awaits them if the opposition wins. Beware, your dreams come true, said one ...
Government facing the onslaught by appealing to the interests of another faction of the bourgeoisie linked to industry (or what in Argentina can still call it that). And the current drama is that the parties of the Marxist left, which is supposed to represent the interests of the working class, are unable to make a proper reading of the case, limited-at best-a state that both sides are fractions of the bourgeoisie and therefore the result of the conflict is irrelevant. I said "the best" not to mention the worst: unworthy submission to the interests of the Rural Society.
What does not seem to have learned the Marxist is that conflicts affect inter-bourgeois workers objectively, and that the defense of the interests of workers required to identify what is at stake in each case.
The working class must have an independent policy of the bourgeois parties, it is true. But "independent policy" means, among other things the uncompromising defense of their interests in this . An example that I hope the Marxist Left has treated: if mamarrachesca "opposition" at this time threatening a coup or interruption of the democratic system, the mission of the workers would certainly screened-in defense of their own class interests, not a "democracy" abstract constitutional order. It would be suicidal to proclaim to the workers that "It is a conflict between capitalists, the output is working, socialist!".
The same applies to this conflict. It is true that this is a dispute between capitalists, but it is also true that a fraction capitalist interests overlap with the interests of the working class, while another faction wants to sweep capitalism outright to industrial activity and with it the working class, making Argentina a an African republic where a handful of families own the natural resources in order to sell to the international market, while 90% of the population consumes in poverty.
As has happened many times throughout the history of Argentina, in the eyes of a left stunned workers vote over and over again the party that has understood this better than anyone: Peronism. Da
worth reading the OP-perhaps the most lucid of the parties of the Marxist left, when he writes, referring to cuts in the path of "field" and confront the possibility raised by some official organizations:
Government (and their minions trucho picketers and union bureaucracy of the CGT and the CTA) has mounted a string of provocations, ranging from its shock troops, the mobilization of the gendarmerie and to the encouragement of 'anti lock outs' of carriers, to encourage a greater concentration of power and a kind of civil dictatorship
The lock out "field "looking for food shortages and famine infinite (the spine at 80 pesos, he preached De Angeli), hitting anyone before the working class. The OP is outraged by the expression "up" against lock outs "and denounced as a ploy to get" increased concentration of power "and" civilian dictatorship "to borrow the phraseology of the opposition shows complete disorientation of the left when the concrete class struggle unfolds in front of his nose. Think that the class struggle is something that is triggered only when they play the trumpet, not as a historical process independent of their desires, which the class party must serve and not vice versa.
PO I'd love to explain how an anti-lock out, an action intended to destroy a "lock out can be bad for workers. "It's bad because we do not decide but the government" is precisely the Marxist explanation of the Argentine, who does not understand that a decision on any action must be based on class interests and no leads on who the , so only the class to win the game. A golden rule of any Marxist party would have to be this: the workers have to participate in any conflict that touches their interests, whether a conflict interburgués, that is just "political independence of the class."
So then we are in a situation which left the existing wall is a bourgeois government. And this is bad for workers, resigned to not having even a party that clearly identify their interests. This reduces the chances of fighting and forced to choose just the lesser evil, reinforcing the isolation of the options to the left.
Breaking this vicious circle implies first of all understand that revolutionary politics is not exhausted by the loud chatter of Jorge Altamira, class interests arise in conflicts not only manufacturing but also in the general direction of current policy, and faces a ruthless enemy, powerful and willing to do anything to draw from the human work to the last drop.
So the fight is not over.
0 comments:
Post a Comment